More Missouri babies die as laws, oversight lag

BY NANCY CAMBRIA

After their first child was born prematurely and died, Lily Rieger's parents wanted to be as cautious as possible with their second baby girl.

Lily's parents checked out 11 child care facilities, six of them licensed.

The centers felt too antiseptic and institutional. So they focused on home day care providers and interviewed five.

They went with Jennifer Winkler of Eureka. She was warm and friendly and had two young children. She didn't have a child care license, but that didn't seem to be important in a home day care. The parents felt further assured because two St. Louis County police officers sent their children to her house for care. "They looked like a normal, typical family," said Lily's father, Bill Weishaar, of their decision to hire Winkler. "But nobody ever told me you take a great risk in putting a baby in somebody's hands when there is no second adult around."

Last year, Lily's parents joined a growing list of those whose young children died from violence or preventable accidents in Missouri's vast array of unregulated home day cares.

In October, the Post-Dispatch profiled more than 40 deaths from 2007 through 2010, pointing to what many child advocates now regard as one of the greatest safety issues facing children in the state: lax standards and oversight of home day cares.

Now, state records show that even as momentum to address the problem builds among legislators and prosecutors, the deaths continue. Preliminary statistics for the first seven months of 2011 indicate Lily was one of at least nine children to die last year in child care for reasons not clearly linked to an illness.

On July 29, Lily's father dropped off his happy 13-month-old with Winkler. Lily was airlifted that afternoon to Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center in need of emergency surgery to control swelling and bleeding in her brain. She was taken off life support two days later.

Though doctors never told the parents they suspected Lily had been shaken, her mother, Kara Rieger, said they didn't have to. Doctors explained that Lily's brain had been torn from the tissue that anchored it to her skull, causing it to slosh from side to side.

Winkler, who is in jail awaiting trial, has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder and fatal abuse of a child. Her attorney could not be reached for comment.

A CALL TO ACTION

The nine deaths reported in child care in 2011 are an incomplete tally. The state's child fatality review system may not have a final report until next year.

But the latest deaths continue a pattern the Post-Dispatch uncovered in a six-month investigation last year. Seven of the nine reported deaths in 2011 were in unlicensed home day cares, where caregivers are not required to have any training, need not adhere to safety standards and have little or no oversight.

The Post-Dispatch previously reported that 41 of 45 deaths in child care in the prior four years occurred in unlicensed home day cares. The newspaper's investigation showed Missouri has some of the weakest child care regulations in the nation, allowing the bulk of Missouri children to enroll in unregulated day cares.

In the most egregious cases, the investigation found children died in day cares where providers repeatedly defied enrollment laws. In one of those fatality cases, a provider was attempting to care for eight children under the age of 2.

After years of inaction on legislation seeking to deter deaths in child care, this year may be different.

"It's starting to generate more discussion among the constituencies that drive what we do," said Sen. Scott Rupp, R-Wentzville, the 2012 Senate sponsor of Nathan's Law and Sam Pratt's Law — two child care safety bills that have languished in past sessions. "I've had the president of the Senate ask if someone was dealing with this, and we said we were."

In a final report released this month, the new bipartisan House Interim Committee on Strengthening Missouri Families also recommended to House Speaker Steven Tilley the passage of Sam Pratt's Law and Nathan's Law in light of testimony that cited the Post-Dispatch investigation.

Those bills aim to tighten enrollment limits in unlicensed day cares, increase fines for rogue providers and give the state power to shutter unlicensed day cares that may be dangerous.

A St. Louis consortium of five child welfare and day care agencies has declared day care safety a top agenda item.

"Protecting the lives of kids is essentially the bottom line, and the state of Missouri needs to be compelled to ensure the basic safety and well-being of kids in child care," said Richard Patton, director of Vision for Children at Risk, the umbrella agency for the coalition. Patton said the Missouri Children's Leadership Council, a statewide coalition of child service agencies, also had made child care safety a top agenda issue this year.

SIMILAR ACCIDENTS

The latest deaths also point to an ongoing crisis centered on sleep safety in unlicensed care.

The Post-Dispatch investigation found that more than three-fourths of the deaths from 2007 through 2010 were sleep-related, most often in unregulated care where children were put down for a nap in unsafe conditions. Similarly, four of five suspected accidental suffocations last year occurred in unregulated homes.

Among them was Jordan Brooks, 4 months. He slept overnight at his unlicensed care providers' home in Ferguson in February because of inclement weather. Police and medical examiner records show that on Feb. 1, about 1:30 a.m., Jordan was placed on his abdomen on a couch by one of the caregivers.

Safe sleep experts say babies should always be placed in a crib on their backs for sleep.

The caregiver then fell asleep on the sofa with the baby. When the caregiver awoke three hours later, Jordan was not breathing. An official with the St. Louis County Medical Examiner's Office said the man rolled onto Jordan in his sleep, causing the baby to suffocate.

"I had no idea they weren't using a crib, and I definitely didn't know they were co-sleeping with him," said Jordan's mother, Ashley Brooks. She said she felt as if her son's death had been ignored.

Because reports on most deaths in unlicensed child care remain sealed from the public, parents seeking child care cannot find out whether a child has died in a specific provider's care.

Police records indicate Jordan's caregivers were investigated afterward by state regulators for possibly caring for too many children without a required license. But because no rule violation was found, the regulatory file was sealed. Under state law, unsubstantiated investigations of rule violations are not open to the public.

Brooks said the couple continued to run an unlicensed day care out of their home. They are still not subject to inspections or state safety standards.

MORE PUNISHMENT

The 2011 child care deaths — like those from prior years — show that the most dangerous day cares for children are homes in which providers defy rules by caring for too many children. Those rules require a license when caregivers care for more than four children who are not related to them.

The Post-Dispatch investigation found that prosecutors rarely charged providers operating without a license with a crime, even after a child died in their care, because the punishment was so lenient. State law currently allows a maximum $200 fine for a crime that's classified on the same level as a traffic ticket.

But in 2011, with increased scrutiny on illegal day cares, at least two such deaths led to criminal charges.

In one case, caregiver Cherie Kohenskey of Troy, Mo., was charged with second-degree involuntary manslaughter — the first time a serious felony charge has been brought against a provider in Missouri regarding an accidental sleep suffocation. The charges carry a maximum four-year jail term and $5,000 fine.

Parent Jody Haggard said Kohenskey assured her she would watch only four children for pay on July 21 when Haggard dropped her infant off at the home day care. Haggard's son, Levi, 2 months, suffocated later that day after being put down for a nap on his abdomen in an adult bed. State documents allege the caregiver was watching eight children unrelated to her, as well as two of her own.

Lincoln County Prosecutor Leah Askey said she didn't want to charge Kohenskey, but a grand jury did.

"The parents lost their infant son who was otherwise healthy because the day care provider had too many children in her care and wasn't adequately able to provide supervision," she said. "I certainly don't think she was malicious, but at the same time I do believe that child's life was lost and it didn't have to be."

Kohenskey pleaded not guilty. Her attorney declined to comment on the case, which is still pending.

In another case, caregiver Michelle Brown was charged with false impersonation, after Macie Barton, 3 months, died in her home day care in Lee's Summit. The day Macie died, police and regulators documented six children, all under 2, in Brown's home. Court and regulatory documents also suggest Brown lied to police and parents about being licensed.

Brown could not be reached through her attorney. She pleaded guilty in September and was given two years' unsupervised probation.

The official cause of Macie's death was pneumonia, yet she had been to the pediatrician that morning for a follow-up on an ear infection and there were no health concerns. Experts in sleep deaths have said that traces of pneumonia in the lungs too often lead pathologists to rule the illness a cause of death when accidental suffocation is probably the cause. Macie died while napping for a long period in a swing, a sleep practice that experts in infant sleep death consider hazardous.

Barton said she was pleased that Brown must now serve two years of probation. But she's offended by the other part of the sentence: a $10 fine.

"Ten dollars, seriously? What's the point of even fining her then?" she said. "That is extremely insulting to me."

TRAGEDY INTO LIGHT

Lily Rieger's parents are waiting for justice for their daughter.

They think that Lily would be alive today had her caregiver received mandatory training that included information on the dangers of shaking a baby.

The parents said they came forward about Lily to remind others that much of what happens in unregulated home child care is seen only by the eyes of very young children.

Even after Winkler was formally charged and the death was reported in the media, Winkler was described by police as a "baby sitter," and not a day care provider. Weishaar said parents should know Winkler cared for at least three other children part time, in addition to her two young children.

But in Missouri, the distinction between who is an occasional baby sitter and who is a regular, home-based child care provider is often difficult to determine in state records, even in cases in which a crime against a child may have taken place.

There are no public files on Winkler with child care regulators. Under state law, Winkler was not required to register her child care with the state.

So it has fallen to Lily's parents to let the public know.

Source http://www.stltoday.com/news/special-reports/daycares/more-missouri-babies-die-as-laws-oversight-lag/article_086e3cb5-1d44-5512-a038-4d4c2ff70eed.html

State failing to spur kinship custody - Virginia

4.6% of foster kids stay with relatives in 2010 - lowest in the nation

Virginia ranks last in the nation when it comes to asking relatives to become foster parents, even though promoting such so-called "kinship care" is official state policy.

Only 4.6 percent of kids in foster care were with relatives in 2010, well below the national average of 24 percent, the Virginia Commission on Youth reported to the General Assembly this week.

For one Staunton family, the Simms, who have been trying to win custody of a cousin's infant, the finding is no surprise.

"I really don't know what to say," added Sylvia Simms. Licensed as a day care provider and as a treatment foster parent, she and her husband, Army veteran William Simms, say they've been rebuffed and misled by local social workers in their efforts to care for the infant.

The infant's foster care plan, prepared by the social workers, contradicts findings by the infant's court-appointed guardian ad litem, who had recommended placing the infant with the Simms. The social services department has declined to comment, beyond saying there are two sides to every story and saying the state's policy is to encourage kinship care.

The commission reported "the negative perception held by child welfare workers 'that the apple does not fall far from the tree,'" was one reason why kinship care lagged in Virginia.

In addition, it said, many Virginians object to the idea that people be paid to care for relatives who need foster care.

But the commission also reported caregivers looking after relatives find it is tough to get help with health care, child care, housing and mental health services that children in foster care are supposed to get.

In many cases, such caregivers don't know, or aren't told, they are entitled to welfare, help with health care coverage or for a wide range of other support services intended for children in foster care, the commission said.

It recommended the state Department of Social Services move forward with its previously announced plans to create an assistance program to help people providing foster care to relatives.

It also asked the state Department of Education to ensure school systems understood they could not assume children in foster care with relatives were not local residents and therefore not entitled to free schooling.

The commission also suggested Virginia re-examine its list of crimes that permanently bars people from taking relatives into foster care, noting these can include single instances of misdemeanor drug possession.

Source http://www.newsleader.com/article/20120114/NEWS01/201140323

Family grieves after child is taken by CPS - Arizona

by Kristine Harrington

PHOENIX -- They are the cases that tug at the heart, children torn away from their families because Child Protective Services (CPS) believes their living conditions to be unfit.

It's the struggle one Arizona family is trying to cope with right now, losing a young family member, and they say it isn't fair.

Devon Cone is 2 years old.

“Devon is very close to all of us, he's very close to his brothers,” said his aunt, Cari Cone. “We are a very close family. We have all these kids. They are all happy, every single one of them is happy.”

Devon's mom is a drug addict who lost custody of all her children. Her three older boys were all adopted by their maternal grandma years ago. Then came Devon, who turned 2 last week, but his grandma, Mary Boland, was denied Devon.

“I have not slept for days, I have not slept for days,” Boland said.

Cone said she would take him but being unemployed she said CPS denied her, too.

“They told me the reason why is that I don't have the money to take care of him so I said are you going to take my kids too because I don't have the money, but the CPS worker said no,” she said.

That's when Devon went to live with his uncle more than a year ago.

“That's who he thinks is his daddy,” Cone said.

And that's who would be his adoptive daddy, but CPS won't allow it and no one is sure why.

“They are using the excuse that Tracy, my father's ex-wife from 20 years ago, is a better fit,” Cone said. “ But she is in New Jersey.”

CPS will not comment on this case specifically but says family reunification is their goal, but it doesn't always work out.

“We want to look at a child as an individual. A child may not be a fit with the family. There may be someone else who's a better fit for the child,” said Deidre Calcoate, an adoption manager with CPS. “We would talk to the family and help them understand why the child was not placed with them.”

Whatever the reason, it is impossible for all these broken hearts to understand.

“I want my brother, I want my brother to stay with us,” cried one of Devon's brothers.

Of course, custody battles are always heartbreaking and costly. Still this family plans to fight and hopes to bring Devon home someday.

Source http://www.azfamily.com/news/Family-grieving-their-child-taken-by-CPS-137323248.html

CHILD WELFARE: Navigating a Fractured System

This is a good read - the first in a series:

http://www.kvnonews.com/2012/01/child-welfare-navigating-a-fractured-system/

Child Missing From CPS Shelter, Mother Wants Answers

by Mike Manzoni

PORTLAND -- The mother of a child in protective services custody who went missing Tuesday wants to know how her daughter got out of a shelter where she was staying.

Lori Marie Rivera, 13, went missing Tuesday afternoon with two 17-year-old girls from the Teen Connections shelter in Portland.

Terry Rivera, the girl's mother, said she was not notified her daughter was missing until the day after, and said she has struggled to get answers from Child Protective Services.

"You [CPS] promised you were going to put my children in a safe place, and nothing was going to happen to them and she [CPS case manager] told me, 'Well, we did try to put her in a safe place, but if she ran away that was her own thing of running away,'" said Rivera.

Rivera said she lost custody of her daughter after a drug raid involving her husband a few years ago. The girl has lived at the shelter in Portland since November.

Portland police are investigating Rivera's disappearance as a runaway. Child Protective Services has notified the appropriate courts and the girl's attorney.

Source http://www.kristv.com/news/child-missing-from-cps-shelter-mother-wants-answers/